CLIMATEGATE BOOK - Exposing the Global Warming Scam

More Proof: the warming is rigged

The global temperature is rigged to read warm.  I revealed this fact in Climategate in 2010.  I restated it in Eco-Tyranny in 2012.  Today the  Daily Mail verifies my work via government whistleblower:

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised.

Read more:

  • Share/Bookmark

One Response to “ “More Proof: the warming is rigged”

  1. Thomas Dorsch says:

    I appreciate anyone reporting on the other side of this issue. Imagine losing your funding for research because your results are contrary to what is being hyped. Being correct has never popular in all instances. In the type of work I do, we made a lot of money on Y2K. In most situations I told my customers everything would be ok. (without any doubt, as I had experimented) But most large concerns bought the hype. It bothers me to see the same thing happening again. Our current situation needs monitoring. But to revamp all protocol without global participation is futile. And with 100% cooperation the results could be hundreds of years in the making if ever at all. More people need to open their minds, even in disagreement. I was born in a society of ecology, civic pride, and benevolence. I’m a really old boy scout who still believes in reduce, recycle,and reuse. When I see garbage on the ground I pick it. If everyone did small things it might matter. But I see most walking past the garbage and getting into their Prius and driving away. I have a old adult son who wants to save the world but won’t sort recycling properly or break down cartons because it’s too much trouble. Landfill waste can be reduced but nobody talks about it because it’s multi-billion dollar business. Our family of three does not fill one 33 gallon garbage can weekly. Our recycle bin is full however. And I worry about what emissions are created in the process of recycling. Plastics renewal has more bad attached than many think. Let’s face it, unless you educate yourself you’ll only know what the talking head says on the TV. Too many opinions and not enough truths. So theoretically both sides are potentially correct until one is proven wrong. When we know it will be too late. I do my very small part because it was woven into me as a child. If we can’t do small things with better compliance how could we tackle Goliath? If in fact tackling Goliath is a worthwhile venture.

Leave a Reply

© 2018 Climategate Book   |   Brian Sussman | Eco-Tyranny Book


WordPress Web Design Portland